"If the president was walking around stabbing innocent Muslim people? People would be like ‘Oh he’s a murderer’. But because you do it with fucking sky robots every day it’s ‘foreign policy’."
-Jamie Kilstein on today’s Citizen Radio
Ugh. "Progressive" "feminists".
As a comparison to how dumb this argument is:
presidenta woman was walking around stabbing innocent people? People would be like ‘Oh he’sshe's a murderer’. But because you do it with fucking sky robotsRoe v. Wade every day it’s ‘foreign policy’‘women's rights’."
-A conservative version of Jamie Kilstein on today’s "Pro-Life" Radio
If you told a "progressive" this "joke", they'd be blue in the face trying to explain the difference.
Anyhow, since it seems to be required, what is the difference between the President's use of drones and the Woolwich attack?
Off the top of our heads here:
- Drone attacks actually target specific individuals as opposed to random innocent citizens
- Drone attacks typically happen in areas where you can't simply call 911 and have them arrest the bad guys
- Terrorists seem keen to use the most damaging weapon in their arsenal first. This approach is not used by the USA.
Etc, etc, etc.
To top it off, the "CitizenRadio" episode actually covered the news about "breadwinners":
"why some men freak out over female breadwinners"
This is the same card PZ played - instead of talking about the real issue the piece (or at least the tagline) is just a cheap swipe at Fox News.
For those that need a refresher on how ridiculous Kilstein is, check out what he has to say to some women in his audience and what he has to say about Islam.